This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
MSFS Performance Score
Honeycomb Aeronautical Alpha Flight Controls XPC scores 60.5/100; travelAndFeel (30% weight) is the dominant factor at 55/100.
Verdict for MSFS
The Honeycomb Aeronautical Alpha Flight Controls XPC scores 60.5/100 for MSFS, offering a hybrid-build 180° rotation arc with 36 buttons that covers most GA cockpit workflows during VFR cross-country legs. Best suited for pilots stepping up from a gamepad who can live without force feedback and accept medium-spring feel as a substitute for real control loading.
Reviewed: March 2026
Full Specifications
| Connection | USB |
| Force Feedback | No |
| Axis Count | 3 |
| Button Count | 36 |
| Compatibility | PC, Xbox |
| Release Year | 2022 |
Pros & Cons for MSFS
Pros
- ↑ The hybrid construction and medium-spring resistance hold up across extended IFR sessions — where cheaper all-plastic yokes at this budget tier flex noticeably during aggressive pitch inputs on a missed approach, the XPC's build keeps inputs consistent through the full 180° arc.
- ↑ Plug-and-play USB-direct connection means MSFS 2024 detects the XPC on first launch; all three axes map cleanly without driver installation, and the 36 buttons give you enough bindings to cover autopilot panel, view cycling, and ATC commands without reaching for the keyboard mid-approach into a dense photogrammetry city like London Heathrow.
- ↑ At the budget tier, most alternatives offer fewer than 20 assignable buttons — the XPC's 36-button layout lets you build a functional cockpit workflow for GA aircraft in MSFS without a separate button box, which matters when desk space is limited and you're managing live weather transitions on a VFR cross-country leg.
Cons
- ↓ The 0/100 force feedback subscore is felt immediately during MSFS 2024's live weather turbulence events — the medium spring simply returns to center with no dynamic load variation, so you lose all tactile feedback on stall onset or gusty crosswind correction during a short-field landing approach.
- ↓ The Travel & Feel subscore of 55/100 reflects a spring mechanism that mid-range yokes replace with more nuanced resistance profiles; pilots moving into complex aircraft or consistent IFR flying in MSFS will notice the artificial center detent during slow-speed maneuvering where precise elevator trim inputs demand a more graduated feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
Compare Alternatives
Honeycomb Aeronautical Alpha Flight Controls XPC vs Logitech G Saitek Pro Flight Yoke System
Compare →Honeycomb Aeronautical Bravo Throttle Quadrant with Alpha Flight Controls Bundle vs Honeycomb Aeronautical Alpha Flight Controls XPC
Compare →Fulcrum One Flight Yoke vs Honeycomb Aeronautical Alpha Flight Controls XPC
Compare →