Simulator Hardware Hardware Rankings
MSFS
Mid-Range

Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit

Next Level Racing · Sim Seat

Check Price →

This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

MSFS Performance Score

87 / 100
MSFS Score
Sim Seat · Next Level Racing
Mid-Range
Value score 7.92 per $100 spent
Mount Compatibility (30%) 100
Adjustability (25%) 90
Build Quality (25%) 90
Footprint (10%) 50
Value (10%) 70

Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit scores 87.0/100; mountCompatibility (30% weight) is the dominant factor at 100/100.

Verdict for MSFS

The Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit scores 87.0/100 for MSFS, delivering a rigid all-metal frame that holds your yoke, throttle, and rudder pedals in precise alignment through long VFR cross-country legs without flex or drift. Ideal for sim pilots building a dedicated cockpit setup, though its large footprint rules out smaller rooms.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Connection N/A
Force Feedback No
Axis Count 0
Button Count 0
Compatibility PC, PlayStation, Xbox
Release Year 2022

Pros & Cons for MSFS

Pros

  • ↑ Full metal construction maintains precise yoke and throttle positioning even during aggressive rudder inputs on short-field approaches — at this price tier, most competing rigs still rely on plastic extrusions that flex under load.
  • ↑ Universal seat and hardware mount system accommodates virtually any yoke, throttle quadrant, or rudder pedal combination you're running in MSFS, with no adapter hunting or custom drilling required.
  • ↑ Height and angle adjustability lets you dial in an ergonomic seating position for multi-hour photogrammetry sightseeing flights or extended online VATSIM sessions without shoulder fatigue — a level of configurability rarely found this complete at the mid-range tier.

Cons

  • ↓ The large, non-compact footprint becomes a genuine problem in shared living spaces — setting up for a VR city flyover session and then tearing it down is not a realistic workflow here.
  • ↓ No integrated monitor or display arm mounting solution means pilots moving up to a triple-screen MSFS setup will need to source separate monitor stands, a feature increasingly standard on rigs in the tier above.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Sim Seat for MSFS?
87.0/100 for MSFS makes this one of the more capable mid-range cockpit frames available for the sim. It excels when you have a full hardware stack — yoke, throttle, and rudders — and need everything locked in precise, repeatable positions during IFR approaches into dense airports like KLAX or EGLL where hand placement consistency matters. Where it shows limits is in portability; if your MSFS setup shares space with other activities, the fixed large footprint will frustrate you, and a quality rudder pedal set would complement it more than any upgrade to the frame itself.
Is it worth the price for MSFS?
At the mid-range tier, most cockpit frames are either plastic-heavy or metal only in the critical load-bearing sections — the F-GT Elite uses metal construction throughout, which translates to a frame that stays rigid across years of use rather than developing wobble at the mount points. The 100/100 mount compatibility score and 90/100 adjustability score indicate you're getting a rig that will accept hardware upgrades without obsoleting the frame, which is strong long-term value for a sim pilot who plans to expand.
What should I look for in a Sim Seat for MSFS?
Mount compatibility is the foundational factor for any MSFS cockpit seat because the sim rewards a full hardware stack — yoke on the left column, throttle quadrant center or right, rudder pedals on the floor — and a frame that can't rigidly and reliably position all three simultaneously forces compromises in control authority during dense airport approaches or crosswind landings. Adjustability matters because MSFS pilots frequently switch between airliner and GA profiles that require completely different seating geometries — reclined for a 737 cruise altitude session versus upright and close for a Cessna pattern work session. The F-GT Elite's 87.0/100 score, anchored by a 100/100 on mount compatibility and 90/100 on adjustability, confirms it handles both factors well, making it a reliable foundation for a serious MSFS hardware build.
Is the Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit compatible with MSFS?
The F-GT Elite is a passive cockpit frame with no electronic components, so there is nothing to detect or bind in MSFS — your connected yoke, throttle, and pedals will still go through their own drivers and MSFS control binding screens as normal. The frame itself requires zero driver setup; compatibility is entirely determined by the hardware you mount to it, all of which MSFS handles through its standard Controls Options menu where you assign primary axes, throttle detent zones, and toe brake axes per device.
How should I configure this in MSFS?
Since this is a passive frame, in-game settings apply to the peripherals mounted on it — for yoke inputs, set a linear sensitivity curve with a 2–4% dead zone to preserve precise roll authority during VFR cross-country legs without over-correcting in turbulence. For rudder pedals mounted to the frame, a 5% null zone is recommended to eliminate the micro-inputs that creep in from seat adjustments during long sessions, and if you're running toe brakes, bind them as separate axes in MSFS Controls rather than relying on any combined axis detection.

Compare Alternatives

Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit vs Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package

Compare →

Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit vs Obutto Revolution Cockpit

Compare →

Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit vs Playseat Challenge X Logitech G Edition

Compare →

Goplus Massage Gaming Chair Racing Style Recliner vs Next Level Racing F-GT Elite Simulator Cockpit

Compare →
Compare with something else