This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

MSFS Performance Score

78 / 100
MSFS Score
Sim Seat · Next Level Racing
Budget
Value score 9.76 per $100 spent
Mount Compatibility (30%) 60
Adjustability (25%) 90
Build Quality (25%) 90
Footprint (10%) 50
Value (10%) 100

Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package scores 78.0/100; adjustability (25% weight) is the dominant factor at 90/100.

Verdict for MSFS

The Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package scores 78.0/100 for MSFS, with its metal construction and high adjustability (90/100) giving heavy airliner pilots a stable, configurable seating foundation during long-haul approaches into dense photogrammetry airports. Best suited for dedicated Boeing-style cockpit builders, though its specific mount system limits peripheral layout flexibility compared to universal rigs.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Connection N/A
Force Feedback No
Axis Count 0
Button Count 0
Compatibility PC
Release Year 2022

Pros & Cons for MSFS

Pros

  • Metal frame construction holds firm during forceful yoke inputs on ILS approaches into crowded hubs like EGLL or KLAX — at the budget tier, most competing seats ship with plastic-dominant frames that flex under the same load.
  • Height adjustability scoring 90/100 means you can dial in exact eye-point alignment for MSFS's PFD and ND panels whether you're flying in pancake mode or inside a VR headset during a VR city flyover over photogrammetry Manhattan.
  • For a budget-tier cockpit seat, the Boeing-specific geometry pays off during long cross-country legs — the reclined seating angle matches real heavy aircraft ergonomics so fatigue doesn't set in mid-Atlantic before you hit ToD.

Cons

  • The specific mount type scores only 60/100 for mount compatibility, which means fitting third-party yoke columns, rudder pedal brackets, or throttle quadrant arms from other manufacturers becomes a fabrication project rather than a bolt-on — felt acutely when building out a full MSFS 737 home cockpit.
  • No force feedback integration or accessory ecosystem at the next price tier up means pilots moving to premium rigs get seat-mounted transducer support and universal rail systems that turn the cockpit into a modular platform — this package is a fixed-layout solution with no upgrade path built in.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Sim Seat for MSFS?
78.0/100 for MSFS is a solid score for a dedicated seating platform, reflecting strong adjustability offset by moderate mount flexibility. It excels during structured Boeing airliner sessions in MSFS — the stable metal base and correct seating geometry keep you locked in through a full VATSIM-controlled EGLL approach with live weather active. Where it shows limits is in mixed-fleet sim setups: if you're hot-swapping between a Fenix A320 yoke config and a GA sidestick rig, the Boeing-specific geometry and restricted mount points make reconfiguring your peripheral layout slower than a universal cockpit frame would.
Is it worth the price for MSFS?
At the budget tier, nearly every competing cockpit seat is either plastic-framed or ships without any integrated mount points at all — this package delivers metal construction and Boeing-geometry ergonomics in the same bracket. The 90/100 adjustability subscore is rare at this tier, and the included mount structure gives you a functional starting point, even if the 60/100 mount compatibility score means you'll hit adapter limitations before long.
What should I look for in a Sim Seat for MSFS?
Mount compatibility is the defining factor for MSFS cockpit seats because MSFS rewards full hardware integration — a seat that can't anchor your yoke column, throttle quadrant, and MCP panel in a stable, repeatable position forces you to fight physical drift while also managing an ILS hand-fly in IMC. Adjustability matters just as directly: MSFS's VR implementation demands precise eye-point positioning so your hands align with physical controls during a VR city flyover, and a seat with limited height or recline range will put your sightlines off the virtual panel every session. The Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package scores 78.0/100 overall — its adjustability subscore of 90/100 is a genuine strength, but the 60/100 mount compatibility score will require planning if you intend to integrate a full suite of peripherals beyond the intended Boeing column position.
Is the Next Level Racing Flight Simulator Boeing Heavy Package compatible with MSFS?
The Boeing Heavy Package is a physical cockpit seat with no USB connection or axis output — MSFS has nothing to detect or bind from the seat itself, so there is no driver setup or control settings configuration required for the seat as a unit. All MSFS control binding work happens at the peripheral level — yoke, throttle quadrant, rudder pedals, and MCP hardware that mount to the frame each require their own axis and button mapping inside MSFS's control settings menu.
How should I configure this in MSFS?
Since the seat itself outputs no control data to MSFS, there are no in-game sensitivity, dead zone, or null zone settings to configure for the seat directly — all those adjustments apply to the input peripherals mounted to it. For Boeing heavy operations in MSFS, set your yoke's pitch and roll sensitivity curves to around 20% with a 3–5% dead zone to match the heavier control feel the seating position encourages, and apply a small null zone of 2% on rudder pedals to eliminate ground-roll twitchiness during long-haul arrivals.

Compare Alternatives

Compare with something else