Simulator Hardware Hardware Rankings
MSFS
Budget

Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max

Winwing · Throttle Quadrant

Check Price →

This page contains affiliate links — as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

MSFS Performance Score

70.5 / 100
MSFS Score
Throttle Quadrant · Winwing
Budget
Value score 14.13 per $100 spent
Lever Count (25%) 40
Build Quality (25%) 90
Detent Feel (20%) 100
Expandability (15%) 20
Compatibility (15%) 100

Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max scores 70.5/100; buildQuality (25% weight) is the dominant factor at 90/100.

Verdict for MSFS

The Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max scores 70.5/100 for MSFS, with full metal construction and 80 buttons holding firm through repeated carrier-pattern touch-and-gos. Built for sim pilots who want F/A-18 replica hardware on a budget, though the dual-lever setup limits multi-engine airliner ops.

Reviewed: March 2026

Full Specifications

Connection USB
Force Feedback No
Axis Count 6
Button Count 80
Compatibility PC
Release Year 2022

Pros & Cons for MSFS

Pros

  • ↑ Metal construction on the handle and base resists flex during aggressive MIL/AB detent slams — at the budget tier, most alternatives ship plastic handles that wobble under repeated throttle jabs during formation flying or short-field go-arounds.
  • ↑ USB direct plug-and-play means MSFS 2024 detects all 6 axes and most of the 80 buttons on first launch without a driver install — you're mapping your flaps, speed brakes, and nosewheel steering within minutes of sitting down for a VFR cross-country departure.
  • ↑ Physical detents give tactile MIL and IDLE stops that translate cleanly to MSFS throttle axis curves — you feel the AB crossover on departure without watching the throttle indicator, which matters when you're heads-down on an ILS in low-visibility photogrammetry approaches into dense airports.

Cons

  • ↓ Two levers cap you hard during multi-engine turboprop or widebody sessions — managing individual engine responses during an asymmetric thrust scenario or engine-out approach in MSFS requires workarounds that a four-lever quadrant handles naturally.
  • ↓ No expandability means you cannot add a separate prop or condition lever module later — the next tier up offers modular bases where you bolt on additional axis banks, which matters as your MSFS hangar grows beyond fast jets into complex GA and airliners.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a good Throttle Quadrant for MSFS?
70.5/100 for MSFS reflects strong build quality offset by a limited lever count. In fighter and single-engine jet scenarios — dense photogrammetry city overflights at low altitude, carrier pattern work, or VR intercept legs — the metal handle, physical detents, and 80-button layout give you direct access to every MSFS system function without reaching for the keyboard. Where it shows limits is any multi-engine piston or turboprop session where separate throttle, prop, and mixture axes are needed simultaneously, and pairing it with a dedicated axis controller or rudder pedals will close that gap.
Is it worth the price for MSFS?
At the budget tier, full metal construction with physical AB and IDLE detents on a dual-lever throttle is rare — most competing hardware at this price point ships with plastic housings and no tactile detent feedback. The 6-axis layout and 80-button count give you enough mappable inputs for a complete MSFS cockpit binding set without compromise on the controls that matter most for jet operations.
What should I look for in a Throttle Quadrant for MSFS?
Lever count defines how many independent power channels you can control simultaneously — in MSFS, flying a twin turboprop into a short mountainous strip means managing two throttle levers and two condition levers separately, and a low lever count forces you onto keyboard shortcuts at the worst moments. Build quality determines whether your hardware survives the mechanical stress of repeated detent cycling and fast throttle sweeps across long online multiplayer sessions without developing axis slop or button ghosting. The Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max scores high on build quality at 90/100 — the metal construction is a genuine strength — but the dual-lever configuration scores 40/100 on lever count, which is the primary drag on its overall 70.5/100 and positions it firmly in the jet and single-engine segment of MSFS operations.
Is the Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max compatible with MSFS?
The ORION2 connects via USB direct with no driver install required, and MSFS 2024 recognizes it as a standard HID controller in the control options menu on first launch. You will need to manually bind the throttle axes, any HAT inputs you want mapped to avionics or views, and confirm the detent position aligns with your chosen throttle axis curve in MSFS's sensitivity settings — MSFS does not auto-assign all 80 buttons, so a deliberate binding session is expected before your first departure.
How should I configure this in MSFS?
In MSFS 2024 control sensitivity settings, set the throttle axis to a linear curve with 0% dead zone and a 3–5% null zone to absorb any resting axis noise near the IDLE detent. For the remaining axes — speed brake, nosewheel steering, or whatever you map to the remaining channels — keep dead zones at 5% and use a slight S-curve (sensitivity around -15 to -20) to reduce twitchiness at center without losing resolution at the ends of travel.

Compare Alternatives

Virpil Controls VPC Throttle MT-50 CM3 vs Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max

Compare →

Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Quadrant vs Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max

Compare →

Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant Airbus Edition vs Winwing ORION2 Throttle F/A-18 Handle Max

Compare →
Compare with something else